Water industry procurement

Procurement built for the UK water industry and the AMP cycle

Water company procurement runs on a five-year clock. Every AMP cycle brings a new investment programme, new Ofwat performance commitments, new frameworks to let and a supply chain that has to be mobilised, measured and held to account for the full period. The procurement decisions taken in the first eighteen months of a cycle shape what the business can deliver in the last three years.

Pro Outsourcing provides senior, embedded procurement leadership to UK water companies. We have worked inside Southern Water and United Utilities on framework management, capital programme tendering, supplier performance and purchase-to-pay, across the transition between AMP cycles. This is delivery experience, not sector reading.

£300mof complex commercial services tenders led end to end inside a £7bn AMP programme
£0.9mpurchase-to-pay savings identified and delivered at United Utilities
2of the UK's largest water companies supported, serving over 11 million customers between them
AMP transitionsupported at Southern Water, with governance and scorecards embedded across all key frameworks for the new cycle
Book a Free Procurement Review
The challenge

Why water utility procurement is different

Water utility procurement is the sourcing, contracting and supplier management that a regulated water company carries out to deliver its Asset Management Plan (AMP) and day-to-day operations, under the Utilities Contracts Regulations and the Procurement Act 2023, within Ofwat's price control and performance commitments.

The AMP cycle sets the pace

Frameworks let late, or let badly, cost a water company delivery in years three to five, when Ofwat's performance commitments bite hardest. Procurement has to be ahead of the programme, not behind it.

Capital and operational spend need different disciplines

NEC4 capital frameworks, design and build partners and commercial services tenders sit alongside chemicals, energy, fleet, telematics and IT. Each has its own market, its own risk and its own compliance route.

Supplier performance has to be provable

Delivery partners on multi-year frameworks need clear measures, incentive mechanisms and reporting that the board, the regulator and the supplier all accept. Without them, performance drifts and disputes follow.

Regulation is layered

Utilities Contracts Regulations, the Procurement Act 2023, Ofwat, DWI and environmental obligations all touch procurement. Governance has to satisfy all of them without slowing delivery to a crawl.

What we deliver

Water industry procurement support

AMP programme procurement

Procurement strategy, planning and forecasting for the AMP delivery programme, so frameworks and contracts are in place when the engineering needs them, not after.

Framework management

Letting, mobilising and managing NEC4 and other high-value frameworks for performance, compliance and commercial value across the full cycle.

Major tenders, end to end

Leading complex capital and commercial services tenders from strategy through to award, including the £300m of tendering activity we ran inside United Utilities' AMP programme.

Supplier performance and Balanced Scorecards

Designing and embedding Balanced Scorecard frameworks and incentive mechanisms across delivery partners, so supplier performance is measured, reported and rewarded consistently.

Governance and compliance

Delegated authority, approval workflows and process controls aligned to the Utilities Contracts Regulations, the Procurement Act 2023 and your sustainability commitments.

Purchase-to-pay and operational efficiency

Overhauling P2P processes and procedures to remove cost and improve control. At United Utilities this identified and delivered £0.9m of savings.

Planning for the next AMP cycle

How a water company should prepare procurement for an AMP cycle

Each AMP cycle brings a larger investment programme than the last, and the supply chain is the constraint. Every water company is competing for the same contractors, the same design houses and the same specialist suppliers at the same time. The procurement functions that win are the ones that are organised before the programme starts spending. From our work inside two of the largest companies, this is the order to do it in.

01

Map the programme to a procurement pipeline

Translate the business plan into a dated pipeline of frameworks, tenders and renewals, with lead times built in. If the pipeline does not exist, procurement is already late.

02

Let the frameworks early and make them work hard

Secure capacity with the delivery partners you will depend on, with commercial terms and performance measures designed for a five-year relationship, not a single project.

03

Embed supplier performance from day one

A Balanced Scorecard with agreed measures, evidence rules and incentive mechanisms, running from mobilisation, so performance conversations are about data rather than opinion.

04

Fix the operational plumbing

Purchase-to-pay, approvals and reporting have to cope with programme volumes. Cleaning these up early releases cash and stops the capital programme being slowed by transactional friction.

Proof

Water companies we have worked with

United Utilities

The UK's largest listed water company, 7 million customers, £7bn AMP investment programme

  • Led £300m of complex commercial services tenders end to end within the AMP investment programme, from strategy to award
  • Managed high-value NEC4 framework agreements for commercial robustness and supplier performance
  • Overhauled purchase-to-pay processes, identifying and delivering £0.9m in savings
Read the United Utilities case study →

Southern Water

4.6 million customers across Kent, Sussex, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight

  • Supported the transition between AMP cycles across governance, communications and supplier performance
  • Led the implementation of the Balanced Scorecard framework across all key frameworks and delivery partners
  • Developed and ran the Business Engagement Model with monthly senior stakeholder reporting
  • Drove procurement governance improvements in line with the Procurement Act and Utilities Contracts Regulations
Read the Southern Water case study →
Why us

Why water companies choose Pro Outsourcing

Founder Tom Evans MCIPS has led procurement inside regulated utilities as well as in manufacturing and life sciences, and has designed and run the supplier performance and incentive mechanisms that water company frameworks depend on. We embed in your team, take ownership of the frameworks, tenders and processes we are given, and stay until the change is in place. No slide decks, no handover to juniors.

Our water sector work extends beyond capital frameworks into operational categories, including the mobilisation of a fleet management and telematics contract let under the Utilities Contracts Regulations.

Book a Free Procurement Review
Related services

Services that support water industry procurement

Fractional Procurement Leadership

Senior procurement direction for the programme, part-time, without a permanent hire.

Procurement Governance

Controls, delegated authority and approval workflows that satisfy the regulator without slowing delivery.

Procurement Act 2023 Compliance

Readiness, templates, notices and training for regulated buyers, led by a certified practitioner.

FAQs

Water industry procurement: common questions

What is an AMP cycle and why does it matter for procurement?
An AMP (Asset Management Plan) cycle is the five-year regulatory period in which water companies in England and Wales deliver the investment programme agreed with Ofwat. Each cycle has been larger than the last. For procurement it means a five-year pipeline of frameworks, tenders and supplier relationships that has to be planned, let and managed against Ofwat's performance commitments, in a supply market where every company is competing for the same contractors.
Which procurement regulations apply to water companies?
Water and sewerage undertakers are utilities, so their regulated procurement historically ran under the Utilities Contracts Regulations 2016. The Procurement Act 2023 now provides the framework for new procurements, with its own transparency and notice obligations. Ofwat, the DWI and environmental regulators add performance and reporting requirements that procurement has to support. Good governance satisfies all of them without duplicating effort.
What is a Balanced Scorecard in water company procurement?
A Balanced Scorecard is a supplier performance framework that measures delivery partners against an agreed set of measures, typically covering cost, time, quality, safety, sustainability and collaboration, with evidence rules and often an incentive mechanism attached. Used across a framework, it gives the water company, the supplier and the regulator a shared, data-based view of how delivery is going and what needs to change.
Do you work inside the client's team or as an external adviser?
Inside the team. On both Southern Water and United Utilities we were embedded in the procurement function, owning frameworks, tenders and processes rather than advising on them from outside. That is what allows us to deliver outcomes like £300m of tenders awarded and £0.9m of P2P savings, rather than a report.
Can you help a smaller water company or a water-only company?
Yes. Smaller companies face the same regulatory regime and the same AMP pressures with a fraction of the procurement headcount. Fractional procurement leadership, where senior capability is provided part-time, is often the right model, giving the company programme-level procurement expertise scaled to its size.
Next step

Get procurement ahead of the programme

Book a free 30-minute procurement review with Tom Evans MCIPS. We will look at your AMP programme pipeline, your framework position and your supplier performance arrangements, tell you where the gaps are and whether we can help. No obligation, no jargon.

Book a Free Procurement Review